Pros and Cons of Piracy Essay

The Alliance for pagan Diversity UNESCO working to prevent and weightlift against an ever-increasing level of buc stoogeeering, in part brought ab come on by modern developments in the mapping of modernistic technologies and their consequences on cultural product sales. plagiarism is harmful to authors because it deprives them of the opportunity to scratch financially from their work. The publishing, medicinal drug, audiovisual and softw be industries be the approximately naughtily affected sectors. Critically discuss the pros and cons arguments regarding the consequences of media plagiarization and position yourself in the debate. (2500 Words)This essay go away critically discuss and evaluate the pros and cons arguments contact media buc fuckingeering and its consequences. The aim is to evaluate what media buc fuckeering is and how it has changed the worlds approaches to legislation and secure laws. This essay leave behind humble to accent on the Polit ical, Economic, Technological and Social factors of the consequences of piracy, doing so by positioning myself within the argument.Media piracy whoremonger be defined as the process of the dissemination of some ane elses work with bring out their reasoned consent. Karaginis (2011, p1) believes that piracy has arisen as the consequence of a global determine problem. Panethiere (2005, p9) refers to piracy as the natural process of manufacturing unauthorised copies of protected cloth and traffic with such copies by way of diffusion and sale. As the prices of media goods hold up risen, so give up the issues meet piracy, due to the demand of consumers for sourcing cheaper and more than than cost efficient means of accessibility. Lessig (2004, p62) states that the arranging industry estimate that it loses about $4.6 one meg million million every(prenominal) year to physical piracy. This emphasises scarcely how serious an issue piracy is, due to the fact that many media di stribution companies atomic number 18 losing out on queen-sized amounts of income.A get was behaviored in advance(prenominal) 2011, questioning participants as to whether they thought illicit file sacramental manduction among the public was accept open. Results showed that 70% of those asked believed that downloading illicit materialfrom the Internet was acceptable. The study too showed that three out four, however, matte it was completely unacceptable to hence tell on that product for profit. http//torrentfreak.com/piracy- neighborlyly-acceptable-110228/. This emphasises just how proud percentage of the public that ar will to commit a crime and ineligiblely share files veer various peer-to-peer (P2P) networking sites.plagiarization can occur in many reserve a craps, although as Lessig, L (2004, p67) argues, that the most monumental form of piracy is commercial. He describes this as the unaccredited victorious of different messs kernel within a commercial c ontext of use. nonwithstanding it is strategic to in like manner see at the economical factors, political factors and technological factors surrounding piracy and their consequences. on that point are a rapidly growing number of bulk who are illegally downloading copy justlyed material via various peer-to-peer networks. For many, piracy has become a means to access media such as euphony, films and books for relatively cheap prices and often for drop by the wayside. This is booster cable to great problems within the media distributing industries. There are severe consequences for those found to be breaching copyright laws. Bouchoux (2012, p42) believes that one solution in the fight against piracy of media products is to lower the prices. He argues that the of import reason for piracy is that consumers do not believe that they should look at to pay these blue prices set by the owner.Its not moral, its not right, but its at that place and its flaccid. Theres no one to stop you from doing it, and believably never will be. (Tassi, 2012). It is easy to predict that if one form of media copy is close down down, then another new method will emerge in its place. Napster is an example of a major(ip) P2P sharing site. Launched in July 1999, Napster accumulated over 10 million drug users within nine months. after 18 months, there were close to 80 million registered users on the site, showing just how vast the potential proceeds in this criminal market is. In declination of 2000, a study showed that a huge proportion of consumers were college students taking advantage of the blazingly card-playing Internet connections used on most college campuses. (H2G2, 2003). This demonstrates how applied science has become a major factor in the piracy issue, as the students were taking advantage of the advances intechnology as a means of accessing free media.Legal proceedings quickly shut Napster down, however other works emerged to allow in their place. The se cross to provide users with a service that allows them a way of accessing the media they want for free. There are many reasons as to wherefore mess engage in media piracy. As shown above, the absolute majority of illegal downloads are shamble by teenagers and young adults, most usually in college or university. Economic and social factors make it understandable as to wherefore these downloads are existence made, as the broad(prenominal) prices of todays media makes it difficult for many to afford the legal product, especially within the current fadeout and on a student budget. toll may be a decision qualification factor amongst the reasons that battalion illegally depredator media. If the price is prouder than they are automatic to pay, then they may feel fain to look for other ways of sourcing the media. A common justification for this kind of demeanour is that the companies providing the reliable products are eaverageous and are making millions of pounds. hence many mess believe that one stolen piece of media would be unnoticeable for an organisation that adult and profitable. In other words, the view is that if the victims cant feel the loss, stealing from them isnt wrong.The robin Hood Effect can be applied to piracy in the context of redistributing wealth and income so that economic difference is reduced. In other words taking from the rich and giving to the poor. This is essentially what P2P sharing sites are doing, by providing tribe with a cheaper way of obtaining their favorite media from the large media corporations. Users may feel that their unity bargain for is not significant in the global scheme of sales, however if every consumer had this same motive, then the major companies providing the legitimate product or services would constitute no buyers and soon go out of business.Panethiere, (2005, p9) discusses how it is a maxim of the law in many countries that a right without a remedy is, in effect, no right at all. This is well illustrated in the heavens of rational property where authors and other rights holders are so often unable to utilize the rights that the law gives to them. This is a problem back up by piracy. Panethiere continues to discuss how the P2P sharing sites in any case often ignore the rights of the many good deal whose income is dependent upon the recognition of their work and sales. Panethiere (2005, p11) in like manner suggests that P2P sharing sites are intentionally, deliberately, and systematically attempting to profit from the creations of others. Due to this, strict laws have been present into place to prevent such piracy actually taking place. Recorded music represents the musical life of a nightclub in a particular time. If the scoop of a nations performers are not beingness commercially recorded, then their works are not being preserved and the losses to local finish are incalculable. (Panethiere, 2005). The Recording Industries draw of America are jus t one of many companies working on track down and abolishing piracy, working to protect the intellectual property and First Amendment rights of artists and music labels conduct consumer, industry and technical research and monitor lizard and review state and federal laws, regulations and policies (RIAA 2014). despite the many justification that are offered in its defense, piracy is wrong. By making unofficial copies of any form of media, the user is disruption the law and could in effect be subject to civil and criminal charges. Penalties for piracy in the USA include up to five years in lock up and fines up to $250,000. It is questionable whether given these high risks piracy is worth it (RIAA, 2014). However in response to this question being raised(a), there are very few cases of people who have actually been caught and ultimately fined. In most cases consumers are given a pen warning and some may have their Internet connection disconnected. surrounded by 2003 (the start of the RIAA lawsuits) and mid-2007, only about 20,000 people had been sued, fined or received a written warning. When taking into account the awful numbers of users of P2P sites daily, these statistics on the number of people caught are minute. It is estimated that there are 146 million visits to P2P sharing sites a day, which works out at some 204,000 views and minute and around 53 billion views a year. http//www.go-gulf.com/ intercommunicate/online-piracy/. As Lewkes & Yar (2013, p50) state what was once an use of underground counter-culture, now becomes a norm of of importstream culture. This emphasises just how untroubled consumers are of the consequences they could relegate when illegally accessing this free media provided to them.When looking at the issue of piracy, it may be important to consider the artists views. or so musicians see the accessibility of free downloads as arrogant (a form of free advertizement) whilst other artists may not see this in the same way. P 2P allows users to obtain content for free. In come cases it allows consumers to decide whether or not they like the music and if they will make future tense purchases. This also with applies to films. Having viewed or listened to an illegal download of poor quality, a user may decide to purchase at legitimate copy. Again this relates back to Karaginis (2011) before point that piracy occurs as a consequence of a global determine problem. If these forms of media were available at a cheaper price, users may not look to these sites as a way of either a free or test purchase. well-nigh may argue that piracy is prideful and harmful to artist and producers. When you make unauthorized copies of individuals creative work, you are taking something of value from the owner without his or her permission (Yar 2005). Many would strongly tick off that piracy is stealing and therefore the producers and artists are more than likely to feel betrayed by fans and viewers and that their talents ar e unappreciated. When looking at music artists, using P2P sites has a belt ammunition on effect throughout the industry. non only does the artist lose funds due to pirating but the recording labels, advertising companies and even the loyal fans are also effected, as prices are inevitably raised in drift to make up for their loses (Castells, M & Cardoso, G, 2013) and so a roulette wheel is perpetuated. Some Indy bands make a lifetime solely from the revenue they gain from legitimate sales. Illegal downloads of their music make it super difficult for them to continue to compete in the market and to produce their music. We can also use the case of tribute bands. This could be seen as a form of piracy as the bands are performing songs that they themselves did not write or produce. However, an individual may enjoy the song and therefore purchase the original artists version. This supports the case that piracy can often have positive effects. It can be seen as a form of advertising and ultimately increase awareness, future sales and revenue.Lessig (2004) believes that the internet has provoked piracy. Strict laws and legislation have been introduced to try and protect media producers from copyright infringements but Lessig believes that with the deliver of the Internet, the law has lost its sight of control, the laws eccentric is less and less to support creativity, and more and more to protect certain industries against disputation. Technological advancements are one of the main reasons for the increased use of piracy. The scale of piracy has been led primarily by shifts in technology and cultural practices. We can look back to the introduction of CDs and VCDs in the 1990s, to the growth of DVDs in the early 2000s, and now on to the more recent growth of high-speed Internet connections. The movie piracy business, for instance, was alter in China, with the introduction of DVD burners in 2003. This caused a huge increase in both the supply and demand of p irated DVDs, as it became extremely easy to make copies of media and manage at a much cheaper price. .As we can now access the majority of media digitally, it eliminates the need to have physical copies of CDs or DVDs. This reduces consumers zest to have physical copies of materials, and therefore may increase the chances of someone engaging in piracy. Before the introduction of the new media technologies mentioned above, consumers would have often preferred to buy a CD for its authenticity, i.e. packaging, artwork and quality. However, now we can easily access digital music files of the same quality as a CD, as well as being able to replace the physical artwork, with digital photos. Assuming the consumer has access to a computer it makes more sense for them to easily download a file in the puff of air of their own home rather than way out into a shop or purchasing a dodgy disk from someone selling pirated material in the street. Therefore by providing the public with technolo gy that can deliver such services, it increases the chances of piracy, particularly for those with a low income.No one should absolve piracy and the law needs to plaster bandage down on it in order to allow production and sales of media goods to grow. I believe that despite the many positive effects that piracy can have for consumers and in some cases producers the laws and legislations must honor a way to deter consumers for making this their chosen way of obtaining materials, before the modify to the media industries are incurable. One solution I feel could beeffective is if the companies use some of their profits to implement a stronger key code system. Whereby each user will only be able to use materials once, therefore making it harder to pair and harder to pass onto to others through P2P sites. If piracy continues to take place then it can be assumed that sales will continue to decline. This makes it increasingly difficult for the businesses to survive, as a loss in sales will have a knock on effect throughout the media industry.ReferencesBouchoux, D (2012). clever Properties The Law of Trademarks, Copyright, Patents and Trade Secrets. 4th ed. p42.Castells, M & Cardoso, G (2013). buccaneering nuances How a ontogenesis Portion of the Global Population is construct Media Relationships Through Alternative Channels of Obtaining Content. Portugal University of Lisbon.Jewkes, Y & Yar, M (2013). Handbook of Internet Crime. unseasoned York Routledge. p50.Karagins, J (2011). Media Piracy in rising Economies. United States of America Social knowledge Research Council. p1.Lessig, L (2004). Free Culture How Big Media Uses Technology And The Law To lock Down Culture And Control Creativity. red-hot York The Penguin Press. p62 82.Panethiere, D (2005). The Persistence of Piracy The Consequences for Creativity, for Culture, and for sustainable Development. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. p9.Tassi,P. (2012). You Will Never Kill Piracy, and Piracy Will Never Kill You. lendablehttp//www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2012/02/03/you-will-never-kill-piracy-and-piracy-will-never-kill-you/2/.RIAA. (2014). Who Music Theft Hurts. addressable https//www.riaa.com/physicalpiracy.php?content_selector=piracy_details_online.http//h2g2.com/edited_entry/A741089http//www.go-gulf.com/blog/online-piracy/70% of the open Finds Piracy Socially Acceptable70% of the Public Finds Piracy Socially Acceptable - TorrentFreak